Socialism

During his State of the Union speech, President Trump spoke of socialism as if it were a form of evil: “Here, in the United States, we are alarmed by new calls to adopt socialism in our country. . . . Tonight, we renew our resolve that America will never be a socialist country.”

But we, as Americans, have already put strong socialist measures into our governing structure. SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, that is, food stamps), Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security as about as socialist as you can get, and they are very popular programs.

Trump appears to be equating socialism with communism. But those who accept socialism do not propose government dictatorship. What they favor is broader sharing among all members of a society in the benefits of that society. These days, that means assuring health care for all, no matter how impoverished, and guaranteeing a minimum income for all.

The United States stands out from other western democracies by its failure to provide medical care and protection from poverty for its people. Government support for and provision of health care is virtually universal among all other advanced nations today. To a lesser degree, protection from poverty is widespread.

My sense is that the U.S. slowness in adopting socialistic measures comes in large part from our devotion to capitalism and our deification of rugged individualism. We admire the strong, look down on the weak. And yet the religions most of us accept—Christianity and Judaism—teach us to succor the weak and the poor. We revere the biblical quotes from the New Testament that tell us “The poor you will have always with you” and “Blessed are the meek, for they shall inherit the earth.” The Old Testament tells us that “The meek shall possess the land, and delight themselves in abundant prosperity.”

We are, in short, at odds with ourselves. It’s long since time that we moved toward the benefits socialism can offer us. Newly elected Democrats are already pushing in that direction.

2 thoughts on “Socialism”

  1. Tom,
    You really need to stick to the subjects of your books, Vietnam, writing, etc. When you veer to the left (pun intended) on political/social issues you lose my audience. I for one believe socialism/liberalism/progressivism as well-meaning as they may sound to the uninformed voter is a slippery slope to the loss of our liberties and freedoms.

    Sure there are socialist programs, such as you mentioned and for the most part, they do work for the common good. However, they are also full of abuse and corruption and do rob us of our incentive to achieve and contribute to the common good. Why work when with a little effort and paperwork and the abnegation of personal freedoms, I can live off the government dole.

    LBJ and his great society pushed welfare on lower-income people, especially blacks. Prior to LBJ and the Democrats, social engineering experiments the black families and other lower income groups were stable, hard working, god fearing family units. In the more than 50 yrs since LBJ’s war on poverty and billions of dollars spent he black family unit has all but disappeared among low-income blacks, drugs, single mothers, crime and a sense of hopelessness now pervades the black community.

    There are many other examples of failed socialist programs. I for one chose freedom over big government.

    Like

Leave a Reply to Pete Tuner Cancel reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s